chainmeter
EN | 中文 | ES

Article

Bitcoin Drawdown History: Every Major Crash From ATH, Ranked

Chainmeter · ~2 min read

TL;DR

Drawdown = percentage below the running all-time high. Bitcoin's worst drawdowns (in excess of -80%) occurred in the 2014–2015 and 2017–2018 bear markets, with the 2021–2022 decline (around -77%) actually shallower than both — one data point in the broader volatility-compression pattern seen across this site's other tools.

The formula

Drawdown tracks how far current price sits below the highest price ever reached up to that point (the running all-time high), expressed as a percentage:

Drawdown = 100 × (Current Price / Running ATH − 1)

This resets to 0% every time a new all-time high is set, and turns increasingly negative as price falls further below the most recent peak.

Why percentage terms, not dollar terms

A raw price chart makes 2013's crash from roughly $1,150 to roughly $150 look tiny next to 2021's crash from roughly $69,000 to roughly $15,500 — but both were similarly severe in percentage terms (both well over -75%). Percentage drawdown puts eras with completely different absolute price levels on the same comparable scale.

The historical ranking

The deepest drawdowns in Bitcoin's history, in excess of -80%, occurred during the 2014–2015 and 2017–2018 bear markets. The 2021–2022 decline, while dramatic in dollar terms given the much higher price level, was actually shallower in percentage terms at around -77% — consistent with a broader pattern of gradually moderating drawdown severity as the asset has matured, though based on only three or four major episodes.

What deep drawdown does and doesn't tell you

Deep drawdowns have historically coincided with cycle floors across Bitcoin's short history — but "historically" here means three or four episodes, and there's no mechanism guaranteeing a given drawdown depth marks a floor rather than a stop along the way to a deeper one.

Every historical crash gets ranked live, computed from the full price history, at the Drawdown from ATH chart.

A couple of things worth clarifying

The 2014–2015 and 2017–2018 bear markets both produced drawdowns in excess of -80% from their respective all-time highs — the deepest stretches in Bitcoin's recorded price history.

A deep drawdown isn't a buy signal by itself — the same descriptive-not-predictive caveat that applies everywhere else on this site applies here too. Deep drawdowns have coincided with past cycle floors, but that's a small sample, not a mechanism. One plausible explanation for why drawdown severity has trended down over time, consistent with this site's volatility tools, is a maturing, higher-market-cap asset with more diverse holders being somewhat less prone to the extreme percentage swings of its earliest, thinly-traded years — though three or four data points is a limited basis for that claim.