chainmeter
EN | 中文 | ES

Tools · Historical

Drawdown from ATH

How far Bitcoin currently trades below its running all-time high, expressed as a percentage. Normalizing by percentage instead of dollar price is what makes the 2014, 2018 and 2022 drawdowns directly comparable despite wildly different price levels.

Data: PriceUSD · Coin Metrics community API · computed live in your browser, nothing uploaded

Loading current reading…
Fetching data…

Hold Ctrl (Cmd on Mac) + scroll to zoom · drag to pan · pinch to zoom on touch

What this chart shows

This page tracks Bitcoin's running all-time high and expresses every day's price as a percentage below it. A reading of 0% means price just made a new high; a reading of -80% means price is trading at one-fifth of its peak.

Drawdown % = (Price / Running All-Time High − 1) × 100

Because drawdown is a percentage rather than a dollar figure, it puts eras with completely different price levels on the same axis — a -80% drawdown in 2015 and a -77% drawdown in 2022 are directly comparable in a way that "$150" and "$15,500" are not.

How to read it

The gauge shows today's drawdown; the chart's bottom pane plots the full history, with the worst drawdown on record marked by a horizontal reference line. Deep drawdowns have historically coincided with the same cyclical floors flagged elsewhere on this site (Realized Price crossing below market price, NUPL turning negative); this page adds no new information beyond price itself, but presents it in the form most people actually mean when they ask "how bad has it gotten."

Limitations

Bitcoin has recovered to new highs after every drawdown in its short history — but that is a track record of roughly four episodes, not a law. Nothing guarantees a new all-time high is reached again after any given drawdown; the historical pattern is real but the sample is small.

Drawdown depth has been shrinking across cycles (roughly -87% in 2014-15, -84% in 2018, -77% in 2022), consistent with the same volatility-compression pattern discussed on the 200-Week MA and Composite pages — but three data points is a trend sketch, not a forecast.

This metric says nothing about duration. A -50% drawdown that recovers in three months and one that takes three years look identical on this chart at their lowest point; check the x-axis, not just the depth.

Further reading

Bitcoin Drawdown History: Every Major Crash From ATH, Ranked

FAQ

What was Bitcoin's worst-ever drawdown?
The chart above computes it live from the full price history. Historically, the deepest drawdowns (in excess of -80%) occurred in the 2014-2015 and 2017-2018 bear markets, with the 2021-2022 decline (around -77%) actually shallower than both — one data point in the broader volatility-compression story told across this site.
Is a deep drawdown a buy signal?
Not by itself. It's the same descriptive-not-predictive caveat that applies to every indicator here: deep drawdowns have historically coincided with cycle floors, but "historically" means three or four episodes, and there's no mechanism guaranteeing the pattern repeats on schedule.
Why look at drawdown instead of just the price chart?
Percentage drawdown puts different eras on the same scale. A raw price chart makes 2013's crash from ~$1,150 to ~$150 look tiny next to 2021's crash from ~$69,000 to ~$15,500 — but both were similarly severe in percentage terms, and drawdown is what makes that comparable at a glance.